Thursday, November 2, 2017 — A landmark study from The Australian National University (ANU) into the health impacts of living in a house with loose-fill asbestos insulation has been published in the international journal The Lancet Public Health.
The findings could help bring attention to asbestos hazards in other countries, such as the United States and Canada, where the use of asbestos-contaminated insulation was installed in millions of homes.
The study on loose-fill asbestos in Canberra is the first of its kind to demonstrate the health impacts of living in a house with loose-fill asbestos.
Study lead author Dr Rosemary Korda said the research found the overall risk of contracting mesothelioma was low. Living in a house with loose-fill asbestos was associated with 2.5 times increased risk of mesothelioma in men. There were no recorded cases of mesothelioma among women living in the contaminated houses.
Dr Korda, from the ANU National Centre for Epidemiology and Population Health (NCEPH), said most other studies into asbestos have focussed on high exposure in occupational settings such as the mining, manufacturing and construction industries.
“The ACT Asbestos Health Study examined risks for people who had lived in a house with loose-fill asbestos, and we found that loose-fill asbestos insulation is very likely to be unsafe,” Dr Korda said.
“Our findings have important health, social, financial and legal implications for governments and communities in which asbestos has been used to insulate houses.”
Inhaling asbestos fibres causes mesothelioma, a lethal disease which can take 20 years or more to develop. Asbestos has also be linked to other cancers, including cancer of the lung, ovary and larynx.
Dr Korda said the ANU research examined data on more than one million people who lived in the Australian Capital Territory (ACT) at any time between 1983 and 2013.
The study linked Medicare (universal health insurance) enrolment data, national death registrations and the Australian Cancer Database to compare the incidence of mesothelioma and other cancers in people who had lived in a house with loose-fill asbestos with the incidence of these cancers in people who had not lived in a house with loose-fill asbestos.
The study identified 17,248 people who had lived in around 1,000 houses with loose-fill asbestos insulation over 30 years.
In total, 285 current and former residents of the ACT were diagnosed with mesothelioma. Seven of those residents had lived in a house with loose-fill asbestos insulation before their mesothelioma was diagnosed.
Key findings include:
Four more cases of mesothelioma than expected occurred in men who had lived in a house with loose-fill asbestos insulation;
The association between living in a loose-fill asbestos house and mesothelioma was much weaker than that seen in studies where people were exposed to asbestos through their work; and
Rates of colorectal cancer rates were elevated in both men (32 per cent higher) and women (73 per cent higher) who had lived at a house with loose fill asbestos. These were higher than expected and might be due to unavoidable limitations in the study’s design.
The two-year study was commissioned by the ACT Government, to improve understanding of the health risks associated with living in a house with loose-fill asbestos insulation.
The study was led by the National Centre for Epidemiology and Population Health at ANU, in collaboration with the Department of Medical Epidemiology and Biostatistics at the Karolinska Institutet in Stockholm, the Sydney School of Public Health at the University of Sydney, the Sax Institute in Sydney and the Australian Institute of Health and Welfare in Canberra.
The research in the Lancet Public Health will be available at <http://www.thelancet.com/journals/lanpub/article/PIIS2468-2667(17)30192-5/fulltext?elsca1=tlxpr>.
Anyone with health concerns about living in a house with loose-fill asbestos should contact their doctor.
For media assistance and to arrange interviews, contact the ANU Media Team on 6125 7979 or at <email@example.com>.